You are here:
Home 
Sitemap
Sitemap
Sitemap
- Home
- My MIP
- About Us
- What's New
- FAQ
- Is there evidence that multiple intervention programs work?
- Why are multiple intervention programs so important in public health?
- How does the tool kit fit into public health unit planning and evaluation?
- How do multiple intervention programs relate to a population health approach?
- What’s distinctive about a multiple intervention program?
- What are multiple intervention programs?
- What are the implications for Ontario Public Health Units?
- Modules
- Introduction to the modules
- Module 1: Conduct a Socio-Ecological Assesment
- Module 2: Identify Intervention Options
- Module 3: Optimize Potential Impact
- Module 4: Monitor and Evaluate
- Module 4 Introduction
- Use evidence to select and design an evaluation framework
- Develop a range of process and outcome indicators to evaluate your program
- Set up consistent data collection
- Develop tools to collect data on your program
- Use feedback to modify the program to make it more effective
- Plan to monitor spin-offs
- Module 4 Activity
- Module 4 Conclusion
- Final checklist
- Activities
- Module Examples
- Introduction Examples
- Module 1 Examples
- Example 4 - What makes Canadians healthy or unhealthy?
- Example 5 - Socio-ecological assessment: Tobacco-free living and young adults projects
- Example 6 - Reflecting on information gathered
- Example 7 - What we did and should have done in a socio-ecological assessment
- Example 8 - Assembling the research evidence: Fall prevention project
- Example 9 - Socio-ecological assessment: HIV/AIDS in Kenya project
- Example 10 - Tobacco-free living and young adults
- Module 2 Examples
- Module 3 Examples
- Module 4 Examples
- Example 17 - Monitoring, provess, impact, and spin-offs: HIV/AIDS in Kenya
- Example 18 - Applying theoretical frameworks to evaluation design: MSCS project
- Example 19 - Evaluating synergy: Falls prevention and the elderly project
- Example 20 - Adapting a plan for monitoring and evaluation: MSCS project
- Example 21 - Adapting tools: MSCS project
- Example 22 - Process and outcome measures: MSCS project
- Example 23 -Indicators at socio-ecological system levels: MSCS project
- Example 24 - Developing indicators for multiple levels and/or to measure synergies: MSCS project
- Example 25 - Finding synergies: MSCS project
- Example 26 - Process measures: MSCS project
- Example 27 - Achievements at one system level depend on success at other system levels: MSCS project
- Example 28 - Sustainability: MSCS project
- Example 29 - Problems with data sources: MSCS project
- Example 30 – Synergy indicators: MSCS project
- Example 31 - Using monitoring and evaluation results to make adjustments: HIV/AIDS in Kenya
- Example 32 - Adjusting indicators: MSCS project
- Main Case Examples
- Boxes
- Box D - Population health approach and template
- Box E - Population health indicators
- BOX G - What influences health status?
- BOX H - What determines health?
- BOX I - How do gender and ethno-racial origin determine health status?
- BOX J - How do the determinants of health interact?
- BOX K - What are health disparities?
- BOX L - Who carries the heaviest burden?
- Box M - Some social theories and how they help you to understand the determinants of health
- BOX N - Theories of the state and social determinants of health
- Box O - The social justice approach
- BOX P - Research evidence
- Box Q - Decision tree
- Box S - Measuring sustainability
- Box U - Can we learn how to reduce health inequities?
- BOX V - What expertise is available?
- Resources
- Sitemap
- Contact
Copyright © 2005 - 2010 MIP Tool Kit - University of Ottawa and Ontario Ministry of Health.
Website by ihotweb.com
Keeping it simple
